1 00:00:37,750 --> 00:00:16,100 [Music] 2 00:00:43,030 --> 00:00:40,549 update a woman transported by a ufo in 3 00:00:45,029 --> 00:00:43,040 argentina by charles lear 4 00:00:47,029 --> 00:00:45,039 in last week's blog we looked at a 5 00:00:49,350 --> 00:00:47,039 recent report from the pompous region of 6 00:00:51,510 --> 00:00:49,360 argentina that involved a missing woman 7 00:00:54,150 --> 00:00:51,520 who was found the next day in a town 8 00:00:56,790 --> 00:00:54,160 around 65 kilometers from where she was 9 00:00:59,349 --> 00:00:56,800 last seen she reported being in her yard 10 00:01:01,270 --> 00:00:59,359 in jacinto arroyos seeing a light and 11 00:01:03,430 --> 00:01:01,280 then suddenly finding herself sitting in 12 00:01:05,910 --> 00:01:03,440 the road in the town of gettrache with 13 00:01:07,670 --> 00:01:05,920 no memory of how she got there the case 14 00:01:09,990 --> 00:01:07,680 caught the interest of a local ufo 15 00:01:12,149 --> 00:01:10,000 researcher as it bore a resemblance to 16 00:01:14,870 --> 00:01:12,159 an alien abduction case reported in the 17 00:01:16,789 --> 00:01:14,880 area in 1983 the researcher was 18 00:01:19,030 --> 00:01:16,799 interviewed in connection with the story 19 00:01:20,950 --> 00:01:19,040 in the local paper la arena and the 20 00:01:23,590 --> 00:01:20,960 woman's disappearance was presented in 21 00:01:25,749 --> 00:01:23,600 the paper with the alien angle in mind 22 00:01:27,670 --> 00:01:25,759 since the last blog was posted the woman 23 00:01:29,990 --> 00:01:27,680 has come forward and was interviewed for 24 00:01:32,710 --> 00:01:30,000 a video segment posted on the web-based 25 00:01:34,310 --> 00:01:32,720 news site chronica tv in case there 26 00:01:36,310 --> 00:01:34,320 might be any question of whether the 27 00:01:38,230 --> 00:01:36,320 presenters had any sort of bias towards 28 00:01:40,870 --> 00:01:38,240 the alien explanation for the woman's 29 00:01:44,630 --> 00:01:40,880 experience the segment is titled hablo 30 00:01:46,789 --> 00:01:44,640 la moier abducita poranovni on lapampa 31 00:01:49,350 --> 00:01:46,799 which in english according to translated 32 00:01:52,069 --> 00:01:49,360 duckduckgo is spoke the woman abducted 33 00:01:54,230 --> 00:01:52,079 by a ufo in lapampa the woman has been 34 00:01:56,149 --> 00:01:54,240 identified as irma rick and she was 35 00:01:58,709 --> 00:01:56,159 interviewed by a man in the yard outside 36 00:02:01,109 --> 00:01:58,719 her house and a man and a woman in the 37 00:02:02,550 --> 00:02:01,119 studio at this point she still had no 38 00:02:04,389 --> 00:02:02,560 memory of what had happened to her 39 00:02:06,870 --> 00:02:04,399 between seeing the light in her yard and 40 00:02:08,469 --> 00:02:06,880 finding herself in gethrache rick tells 41 00:02:10,869 --> 00:02:08,479 the interviewer that her husband had 42 00:02:12,949 --> 00:02:10,879 gone to look after another property and 43 00:02:14,869 --> 00:02:12,959 that she had gotten up that morning had 44 00:02:16,790 --> 00:02:14,879 two or three cups of mate a 45 00:02:18,630 --> 00:02:16,800 caffeine-rich drink made from ground 46 00:02:21,110 --> 00:02:18,640 yerba leaves and was playing with her 47 00:02:22,550 --> 00:02:21,120 phone her phone started acting up she 48 00:02:24,470 --> 00:02:22,560 described that there were lines 49 00:02:26,949 --> 00:02:24,480 crisscrossing it and then she heard a 50 00:02:28,949 --> 00:02:26,959 buzzing noise outside like when the wind 51 00:02:30,309 --> 00:02:28,959 whistles against the window she thought 52 00:02:32,229 --> 00:02:30,319 her husband might have forgotten 53 00:02:34,630 --> 00:02:32,239 something and was coming back so she 54 00:02:37,509 --> 00:02:34,640 went outside she then heard what sounded 55 00:02:40,070 --> 00:02:37,519 like an incredibly powerful wind and saw 56 00:02:42,070 --> 00:02:40,080 lights many lights that were so bright 57 00:02:44,070 --> 00:02:42,080 she couldn't keep her eyes open in the 58 00:02:45,750 --> 00:02:44,080 first reports rick was said to have 59 00:02:48,070 --> 00:02:45,760 woken up sitting in the middle of the 60 00:02:50,229 --> 00:02:48,080 road with her phone in her hand in her 61 00:02:51,670 --> 00:02:50,239 interview she says she found herself 62 00:02:54,150 --> 00:02:51,680 sitting on the edge of the road with 63 00:02:56,390 --> 00:02:54,160 legs outstretched her arms were on her 64 00:02:58,790 --> 00:02:56,400 legs and her phone still on was in the 65 00:03:01,509 --> 00:02:58,800 pocket of her housecoat the interviewer 66 00:03:03,830 --> 00:03:01,519 asks her when she vanished and she says 67 00:03:07,030 --> 00:03:03,840 it was around 7am the interviewer 68 00:03:10,470 --> 00:03:07,040 clarifies that this was 7am on monday 69 00:03:12,390 --> 00:03:10,480 and that she appeared at 5am on tuesday 70 00:03:14,790 --> 00:03:12,400 rick corrects him saying no i 71 00:03:17,509 --> 00:03:14,800 disappeared on a tuesday and reappeared 72 00:03:19,430 --> 00:03:17,519 on a wednesday rick says that the first 73 00:03:22,149 --> 00:03:19,440 thing she did after finding herself in 74 00:03:24,309 --> 00:03:22,159 gethrache was to call her children she 75 00:03:26,949 --> 00:03:24,319 found herself unable to speak and began 76 00:03:28,789 --> 00:03:26,959 texting the man in the studio points out 77 00:03:30,789 --> 00:03:28,799 that she was still unable to speak in 78 00:03:33,430 --> 00:03:30,799 the hospital where she was taken after 79 00:03:35,750 --> 00:03:33,440 being found by a catrache police patrol 80 00:03:37,910 --> 00:03:35,760 and rick confirms this a man in the 81 00:03:40,710 --> 00:03:37,920 studio brings up the abduction idea with 82 00:03:42,869 --> 00:03:40,720 this question irma evidently this is the 83 00:03:45,190 --> 00:03:42,879 first time you're telling your story the 84 00:03:47,430 --> 00:03:45,200 possible abduction is that how you say 85 00:03:50,070 --> 00:03:47,440 it by a ufo in the enormity of the 86 00:03:51,910 --> 00:03:50,080 province of la pampa now surely you've 87 00:03:54,149 --> 00:03:51,920 told this to your friends relatives 88 00:03:56,550 --> 00:03:54,159 acquaintances how did you say it and how 89 00:03:58,789 --> 00:03:56,560 was it received did they believe you or 90 00:04:00,550 --> 00:03:58,799 not the interviewer points out that this 91 00:04:02,470 --> 00:04:00,560 is the first time she's spoken about 92 00:04:04,470 --> 00:04:02,480 what happened to her with anyone other 93 00:04:06,869 --> 00:04:04,480 than her husband and rick corrects him 94 00:04:09,670 --> 00:04:06,879 saying she discussed it with her husband 95 00:04:11,670 --> 00:04:09,680 and her kids the man in the studio asks 96 00:04:13,830 --> 00:04:11,680 what they had to say about it and rick 97 00:04:15,910 --> 00:04:13,840 replies what were they going to say 98 00:04:17,670 --> 00:04:15,920 they're just as startled as me i would 99 00:04:19,990 --> 00:04:17,680 like to know what happened to me but i 100 00:04:22,069 --> 00:04:20,000 still don't know anything the man in the 101 00:04:24,070 --> 00:04:22,079 studio and the interviewer started 102 00:04:25,909 --> 00:04:24,080 discussion with rick about the fact that 103 00:04:28,390 --> 00:04:25,919 her clothes were clean in spite of the 104 00:04:30,390 --> 00:04:28,400 long distance she traveled she confirmed 105 00:04:33,430 --> 00:04:30,400 that her clothes were clean but that she 106 00:04:35,830 --> 00:04:33,440 was told that she was very dirty smelly 107 00:04:38,150 --> 00:04:35,840 the interviewer asks if she walked 60 108 00:04:39,990 --> 00:04:38,160 kilometers and she replies i don't think 109 00:04:42,790 --> 00:04:40,000 i could walk such a distance in that 110 00:04:45,270 --> 00:04:42,800 time the woman in the studio asks if 111 00:04:47,030 --> 00:04:45,280 rick had any marks on her body and rick 112 00:04:49,510 --> 00:04:47,040 tells her that there is a mark on her 113 00:04:51,749 --> 00:04:49,520 head the camera zooms in on a small mark 114 00:04:54,950 --> 00:04:51,759 on her scalp and the man in the studio 115 00:04:57,110 --> 00:04:54,960 says look at that cut so weird this is 116 00:04:59,189 --> 00:04:57,120 incredible marco it's a meticulous 117 00:05:01,590 --> 00:04:59,199 incision and a tough one to do am i 118 00:05:03,670 --> 00:05:01,600 right the interviewer asks if rick can 119 00:05:06,150 --> 00:05:03,680 walk with him to the spot where it 120 00:05:09,029 --> 00:05:06,160 happened and they do so she points out 121 00:05:11,270 --> 00:05:09,039 the location and the interviewer asks so 122 00:05:13,909 --> 00:05:11,280 the abduction took place right there 123 00:05:16,150 --> 00:05:13,919 rick replies i don't remember but i know 124 00:05:18,310 --> 00:05:16,160 i got that far the interviewer attempts 125 00:05:20,390 --> 00:05:18,320 to rule out a conventional vehicle being 126 00:05:22,629 --> 00:05:20,400 involved by pointing out that the road 127 00:05:24,870 --> 00:05:22,639 is about a kilometer from the house and 128 00:05:26,950 --> 00:05:24,880 says if there was a vehicle involved she 129 00:05:29,830 --> 00:05:26,960 would have noticed right irma rick 130 00:05:31,909 --> 00:05:29,840 replies yes i suppose i would have aside 131 00:05:34,230 --> 00:05:31,919 from that take a look all i could hear 132 00:05:36,310 --> 00:05:34,240 was the wind a very strong wind that 133 00:05:38,950 --> 00:05:36,320 seemed to suck you in but that's where i 134 00:05:40,710 --> 00:05:38,960 lost consciousness the man in the studio 135 00:05:42,629 --> 00:05:40,720 says that the staff is checking on the 136 00:05:45,430 --> 00:05:42,639 weather for the day in question and that 137 00:05:47,590 --> 00:05:45,440 there was no call for strong winds at 138 00:05:49,510 --> 00:05:47,600 least from what the records show the man 139 00:05:52,150 --> 00:05:49,520 in the studio brings attention to some 140 00:05:54,469 --> 00:05:52,160 indentations and asks would those be the 141 00:05:56,150 --> 00:05:54,479 mark the record of the event am i saying 142 00:05:57,909 --> 00:05:56,160 it right or not there's some 143 00:06:00,230 --> 00:05:57,919 interference and the man in the studio 144 00:06:02,070 --> 00:06:00,240 gets back to his question and asks i was 145 00:06:04,070 --> 00:06:02,080 saying that those indentations 146 00:06:05,749 --> 00:06:04,080 depressions on the soil could they be 147 00:06:08,309 --> 00:06:05,759 the record of the event could it be a 148 00:06:10,390 --> 00:06:08,319 key to this investigation he brings the 149 00:06:13,110 --> 00:06:10,400 interviewers and rick's attention to a 150 00:06:15,670 --> 00:06:13,120 specific depression and she explains 151 00:06:17,670 --> 00:06:15,680 that's something the dog does the man in 152 00:06:20,390 --> 00:06:17,680 the studio asks if rick would be willing 153 00:06:22,710 --> 00:06:20,400 to tell her story to an agency tied to 154 00:06:25,510 --> 00:06:22,720 the research in these matters she tells 155 00:06:28,070 --> 00:06:25,520 him no i didn't speak to anyone the man 156 00:06:30,950 --> 00:06:28,080 asks but would you be willing to do so 157 00:06:33,990 --> 00:06:30,960 rick replies yes yes 158 00:06:36,150 --> 00:06:34,000 ufo researcher luis burgos posted his 159 00:06:38,790 --> 00:06:36,160 take on the case in a blog titled a 160 00:06:41,909 --> 00:06:38,800 contrarian viewpoint argentina's alleged 161 00:06:45,029 --> 00:06:41,919 abduction in lapampa on the blog site in 162 00:06:47,350 --> 00:06:45,039 explacata the journal of spanish ufology 163 00:06:49,270 --> 00:06:47,360 there he presented his views on the case 164 00:06:52,230 --> 00:06:49,280 is criticism of the way in which it was 165 00:06:55,430 --> 00:06:52,240 handled by the sensationalist media and 166 00:06:57,270 --> 00:06:55,440 accused chronica tv of engaging in its 167 00:06:59,830 --> 00:06:57,280 own ufo circus 168 00:07:02,070 --> 00:06:59,840 burgos laments that no proper on-site 169 00:07:03,670 --> 00:07:02,080 investigations were done and that rick's 170 00:07:05,430 --> 00:07:03,680 phone which could have been used to 171 00:07:07,270 --> 00:07:05,440 track her location during her missing 172 00:07:09,749 --> 00:07:07,280 time was never turned over to 173 00:07:11,909 --> 00:07:09,759 authorities turning to rick burgos 174 00:07:15,110 --> 00:07:11,919 points out that she had reported another 175 00:07:16,870 --> 00:07:15,120 sighting in 2002 he considers this fact 176 00:07:19,589 --> 00:07:16,880 to be something that works against 177 00:07:23,270 --> 00:07:19,599 rick's credibility according to burgos 178 00:07:25,830 --> 00:07:23,280 rick reported that on june 19 2002 she 179 00:07:27,589 --> 00:07:25,840 was awake at around 4 30 a.m when a 180 00:07:29,749 --> 00:07:27,599 bright blueish light shone into the 181 00:07:32,629 --> 00:07:29,759 house she opened the door and saw a 182 00:07:34,870 --> 00:07:32,639 brightly lit device floating over a silo 183 00:07:37,110 --> 00:07:34,880 she said a creature descended that 184 00:07:39,510 --> 00:07:37,120 looked slender and had a sort of head in 185 00:07:42,550 --> 00:07:39,520 its upper section she said i didn't 186 00:07:44,469 --> 00:07:42,560 notice any hands feet or eyes rick 187 00:07:46,790 --> 00:07:44,479 watched as the creature hovered for 188 00:07:49,430 --> 00:07:46,800 about a minute it then dove into the 189 00:07:51,589 --> 00:07:49,440 light and went inside it rick continued 190 00:07:53,749 --> 00:07:51,599 saying the light turned off and i didn't 191 00:07:55,430 --> 00:07:53,759 see where it took off to she said that 192 00:07:57,350 --> 00:07:55,440 the police told her that the bird 193 00:07:59,430 --> 00:07:57,360 droppings on the top of the silo were 194 00:08:01,589 --> 00:07:59,440 burned while what happened to rick 195 00:08:03,589 --> 00:08:01,599 remains a mystery one thing that we can 196 00:08:05,670 --> 00:08:03,599 take away from this case is that 197 00:08:08,070 --> 00:08:05,680 investigators should be careful to 198 00:08:17,560 --> 00:08:08,080 distinguish trace evidence of a ufo